environment

Senate Panel Advances Wildfire Bill Slammed as Timber Industry Giveaway

By Donald Shaw,

Published on Oct 30, 2025   —   4 min read

John CurtisBruce Westerman
A firefighter is followed by fast-rising flames while using a drip torch to set a backfire on July 15, 2006 near Redlands, California. (David McNew/Getty Images)

Summary

Its bipartisan congressional sponsors say the bill, the Fix Our Forests Act, is an important step toward reducing catastrophic fire risk.

💡
Share this post on X and Bluesky!

A Republican-controlled Senate committee voted last week to advance the bipartisan Fix Our Forests Act, a bill that would expedite logging in national forests by limiting environmental reviews and lawsuits. While lumber-heavy industries and business trade associations praise the move as a step toward preventing wildfires, environmentalists call it a corporate giveaway that would throw open millions of acres of land to logging. 

With the socioeconomic costs of forest fires on the rise globally, and with the Western U.S. particularly affected, federal policymakers have faced increased pressure in recent years to develop solutions to help save properties and lives. The bill would create categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) exempting certain wildfire prevention activities from federal environmental reviews. The exclusions would cover projects like removing hazard trees near power lines and thinning forests to reduce fuel loads, with allowances for areas of up to 6,000 acres near roads and trails and up to 10,000 acres in high-risk firesheds. While the law explicitly bars using these authorities “for the sole purpose of timber production,” opponents like Earthjustice and Sierra Club say the definition of “fuels management” is broad enough to allow for clear-cut commercial logging of mature trees.

It also establishes long-term stewardship contracts of up to 20 years, giving companies extended authority to conduct mechanical thinning, forest mastication, grazing, and other vegetation management practices across high-risk areas. Projects must include a “strategy for maximizing the retention of late-successional forests,” but this is only a planning requirement and not a binding limit on the logging of old-growth trees.  

While much of the bill focuses on logging, it also includes a prescribed fire title (co-authored by Democratic Sens. Ron Wyden and Alex Padilla) that would fund cross-boundary burns and training for prescribed fire practitioners. On Oct. 21, 2025, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry approved the bill by an 18-5 bipartisan margin, sending it to the full Senate for consideration. The primary sponsor, Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah), says the bill “will deliver essential tools to combat wildfires, restore forest ecosystems, and make federal forest management more efficient and responsive.” 

Read This Post With a Free Trial

Unlock this post plus get our investigative reports with a two-week free trial subscription. Cancel anytime.

Start your free trial now

Already have an account? Sign in

Share on Facebook Share on Linkedin Share on Twitter Send by email

Unlock exclusive content with a free trial

Get unlimited access to in-depth investigative reports with a 14-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Subscribe