Dozens of Democrats ran for House seats in the 2018 cycle on pledges to reject corporate PAC money and instead rely on smaller donors to fund their campaigns. But a Sludge review of campaign finance records shows that a majority of those Democrats took campaign contributions from a PAC affiliated with the New Democrat Coalition, which itself was funded by more than $2.4 million in contributions from PACs in the last cycle, including PACs affiliated with nearly every major American corporation.
The New Democrat Coalition is a group of 68 centrist, pro-business House Democrats, which describes itself as being “committed to pro-economic growth, pro-innovation, and fiscally responsible policies.” The group was founded in 1997 as an affiliate of the Democratic Leadership Council, a now-defunct nonprofit that worked to shift the Democratic party away from populist, left-wing policies and towards a more business-friendly, Clintonian agenda. The current Chair of the New Democrat Coalition is Jim Himes (D-Ct.), a Wall Street-friendly representative who worked as an investment banker at Goldman Sachs for more than a decade and has supported bills to deregulate the financial industry.
In 2013, the New Democrat Coalition established a political action committee, the NewDemPAC, to help re-elect members of their caucus and elect new like-minded Democrats they believe will help them further their agenda. The NewDemPAC is funded by contributions from the campaign committees of New Democrat Coalition members, but also by millions in contributions each cycle from the PACs of major U.S. corporations and their trade associations, including Comcast, General Electric, JPMorgan Chase, Exxon Mobil, Goldman Sachs, Pfizer and hundreds more.
Sludge is reader-supported and ad-free. If you appreciate our independent journalism, Become a member today. 🙏
Twenty of the 30 newly-elected Democrats who pledged to reject corporate cash took campaign contributions from the corporate-funded NewDemPAC, Sludge’s review of campaign contributions records found. In addition, 25 of them were recently inducted into the New Democrat Coalition, giving the group more members than it has had in years and helping to further its business-friendly agenda in the 116th Congress.
In the past, the New Democrat Coalition has fought to weaken regulation of financial derivatives in the wake of the 2008-08 financial crisis, supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership free-trade package, and helped the biotech industry win patent extensions for biosimilar drugs, among many other pro-business policies. They have been critical of progressives like Bernie Sanders who they say focus too much on income inequality and not enough on economic growth.
Some of the corporate PAC-rejecting Democrats, including Anthony Brindisi and Max Rose, also took contributions from the Blue Dog PAC, which is affiliated with the conservative Blue Dogs caucus. The Blue Dog PAC also takes contributions from PACs connected to U.S. corporations.
Follow The Money
Sign up to get our next investigations over email:
Sludge attempted to ask the newly-elected Democrats about how they square the NewDemPAC contributions with their no-corporate-PACs pledges, but none of them responded in time for publication. Of the 30 new House members of the New Democrat Coalition, few have issued public press releases announcing their affiliation, and the organization’s press release contains no quotes of testimonial from newly-elected representatives.
Below is the list of newly-elected Democrats who said they would reject corporate PAC money but received contributions from the NewDemPAC:
Here is the list of PACs that contributed to the NewDemPAC during the 2017-18 election cycle (click + “Show 331 more” to browse the full list):
Do you value our independent journalism?
Every day, the reporters at Sludge are relentlessly following the money to reveal the hidden networks and conflicts of interest that drive political corruption. We are 100% ad-free and reader supported, so we’re counting on our readers to help us continue calling out powerful politicians and lobbyists. If you appreciate the work we do, please consider becoming a member for $5 a month to support our investigative journalism. We can’t do this work without your support.